Büşra Ortaarabacı,Ebru Özer Topaloğlu

  • Ebru Özer Topaloğlu: Necmettin Erbakan UNİVERSİTESİ
  •  Year : 2025
  •  Vol : 3
  •  Issue : 1
  •  Page : 40-53
When we look at the world population in general, it is seen that women's initiatives in economic and social areas are increasing, but it is possible to talk about the existence of some negativities. When we look at it globally, although new opportunities are offered to women in employment areas, some negativities such as low literacy rates compared to men, social pressure and financial difficulties negatively affect women in entrepreneurship in every environment, as in every environment, in economic and social terms. Despite all the negativities, women who make an effort to realize themselves in entrepreneurship come together under the formation of cooperatives and become stronger in social and economic areas. Women's cooperatives have an important role in the development of countries. In this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty participants who are partners of women's cooperatives operating in Konya province. Five demographic and twenty semi-structured interview questions were directed to the cooperative partners. The answers they gave to the questions directed to the cooperative partners were recorded with the approval of the participants and these records were documented and analyzed by coding in the Maxqda program. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the biggest problems experienced by women's cooperatives were financial difficulties, management problems and employment. As a result of the study, it has been suggested that increasing state support for the problems experienced in women's cooperatives and providing the necessary information will create a solid foundation for women's cooperatives. Increasing state support for cooperatives and providing more grant support for women's cooperatives by the state will be healthier for the established cooperatives. This issue is important for the continuation of the existence of cooperatives experiencing financial difficulties.
Cite this Article As : Ortarabacı, B. & Topaloğlu Özer, E. (2025). Problems and solution suggestions for women cooperatives in türkiye: the case of Konya. Sustainable Welfare, 3(1), 40-53.

Conflict of interest : The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article is published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Sustainable Welfare
2025, Vol3, Issue1
ISSN: 3023-6673
Received : , Accepted : , Published Online :

References

  1. Adıgüzel, Z. & Küçükoğlu İ. (2020). Çalışma Ortamında Algılanan İş Stresinin İşgörenler Üzerindeki Etkilerinin İncelenmesi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 1-16.
  2. Afkari, R., & Arıcıoğlu, M. A. (2023). Türkiye’deki Afgan Göçmenlerin Girişimcilik Sürecinde Sosyal Sermayenin Etkisi: İstanbul ve Konya Örneği Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 17-44.
  3. Bharti, N. (2021). Role of cooperatives in economic empowerment of women: A review of Indian experiences. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 617-631.
  4. Bastida, M., Pinto, L. H., Olveira Blanco, A., & Cancelo, M. (2020). Female Entrepreneurship: Can Cooperatives Contribute to Overcoming the Gender Gap? A Spanish First Step to Equality. Sustainability, 12(6), 1-17.
  5. Başaran, H., Irmak, E. (2022). Devrek’te Yerel Ürün Üretimi ve Yerelde Kadın Girişimciliğinde Kooperatiflerin Yeri, Ahi Evran Akademi, 3(1), 19-31.
  6. Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis For Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758- 1772.
  7. Boz, N., & İrmiş, A. (2023). Bir sosyal girişimcilik örneği olarak kadın kooperatifleri. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 58(3), 2088-2124.
  8. Candan Demirkol, E. (2022). The Women Cooperatives in İzmir After Pandemic. International Journal of Social and Economic Studies, 3(2), 80-92.
  9. Çekici, O.&Bayrakçı, B. (2024). Yoksullukla Baş Etmede Sürdürülebilir Tarım Politikaları, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 87-100.
  10. Çınar, K., Akyuz, S., Ugur-Cinar, M., & Onculer-Yayalar, E. (2021). Faces and Phases of Women’s Empowerment: The Case of Women’s Cooperatives in Turkey. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 28(3), 778-805.
  11. Caswell, J. A. (1989). The Cooperative-Corporate Interface: Interfirm Contact Through Membership on Boards of Directors. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 4, 20-28.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2017). 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher. Sage.
  14. Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012). Empowering Women Through Social Entrepreneurship: Case Study of a Women's Cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 569-587.
  15. Demircan Yıldırım, P. (2023). The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Women's Cooperatives in Western Mediterranean. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, (66), 345-364.
  16. Demirkol, E. C. (2022). Pandemi Sonrası İzmir’de Kadın Kooperatifleri. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Çalışmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 80-92.
  17. Elçi, D. Ö. (2024). Kadın Kooperatiflerine Betimsel Bir Yaklaşım: Şırnak Kadın Eli Üretim ve İşletme Kooperatifi. Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 226-245.
  18. Gündüz, F. F. (2022). Determining The E-Commerce Perception Of Women's Cooperatives. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 57(3), 1701-1718.
  19. Harwiki, W. (2016). The Impact of Servant Leadership on Organization Culture, Organizational Commitment, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) and Employee Performance in Women Cooperatives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 283-290.
  20. Durmaz, Ş. & Baran, B., 2024, Kadın Kooperatiflerine Yönelik Bir Çalışma: Antalya Köy Pazarı Örneği, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 59(3), 1997-2023.
  21. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data Management and Analysis Methods. In N. K. Denzin &
  22. Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 428–444). Sage Publications.
  23. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage Publications.
  24. Karakuş, G. (2022). The Role of Women Cooperatives in Empowering Women and Achieving Gender Equality. Pamukkale University Journal of Business Research, 9(1), 247-259.
  25. Krueger, R. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications. Kutay, T. (2022). The Importance of Women Cooperatives in Rural Development: An Evaluation for
  26. Turkey. Political Economic Theory, 6(1), 119-150.
  27. Merrett, C. D., & Walzer, N. (Eds.). (2004). Cooperatives and Local Development: Theory and Applications for the 21st Century. ME Sharpe.
  28. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  29. Moolakkattu, S. J., & Nair, V. N. (2015). Why Do Women's Cooperative Societies Languish? A Study Oôf Selected Societies in Kottayam, Kerala. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 21(2), 105-125.
  30. Özkök, Y., & Köse, Z. (2021). The Relationship between Cooperatives and Regional Development: A Study on Turkey. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 56(4), 2647- 2664.
  31. Piñán, P. A., & Vibert, E. (2019). The View from the Farm: Gendered Contradictions of the Measurement Imperative in Global Goals. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(4), 436-450.
  32. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series. 16.
  33. Sage Publications.
  34. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A Typology Of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs İn Social Science Research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316.
  35. Öztürk, Ş. (2008). Kırsal Yoksulluk, Türkiye’de Yoksulluk Çalışmaları. Der. Nurgün Oktik, Yakın Kitabevi.
  36. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.
  37. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
  38. Peterson, N. (2014). “We Are Daughters of the Sea”: Strategies, Gender, and Empowerment in a Mexican Women's Cooperative. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 19.
  39. Ponce,H. (2022). The formalisation of women’s cooperatives and the reduction of the informal Economy in Jordan, Fact or Fiction? Revista de Economia Institucional, 60, 197- 219.
  40. Sefer, B. K., 2020. Türkiye’de Tarım Alanında Kadın Kooperatifleşmesine Yönelik Politikaların Sınıf ve Cinsiyet Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi. Işıl, Ö. S., Değirmenci, S. (der.). Yaşamı Örgütleyenler Deneyimler – Kadınlar Dayanışma Ekonomilerini ve Kooperatifleri Tartışıyor içinde. İstanbul: Notabene Yayınları, 116-142.
  41. Serinikli, N. (2016). The Importance of Entrepreneurship in Preventing Women's Poverty: Women Cooperatives and Microcredit Applications. Balkan Journal of Social Sciences, 2016 Special Issue, 598-609.
  42. Silverman, D. (2018). Interpreting Qualitative Data (5th ed.). Sage.
  43. Serinikli, N. (2019). Attitudes of Rural Women Towards Cooperatives: Agro-Tourism Women Cooperatives. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 14(1), 45-57.
  44. Taş, H. Y., & Kazar, E. N. (2019). The Effect of Women Cooperatives in Istanbul on Women's Poverty. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 13(19), 1836-1863.
  45. Thomson, J. (2022, September 8). Massive, Strange White Structures Appear on Utah’s Great Salt Lake. Newsweek.
  46. Vakoufaris, H., Kizos, T., Spilanis, I., Koulouri, M., & Zacharaki, A. (2007). Women's Cooperatives and their Contribution to the Local Development of the North Aegean Region, Greece. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 35.
  47. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (10. Baskı).